Practical Approach for Assessment of End-State Radiological Criteria for Remediation of Radioactively Contaminated Sites

Keywords

safety assessment, remediation, end-state criteria, Chernobyl accident

How to Cite

Bugai, D., Gebauer, J., Sizov, A., & Molitor, N. (2019). Practical Approach for Assessment of End-State Radiological Criteria for Remediation of Radioactively Contaminated Sites. Nuclear and Radiation Safety, (1(81), 36-41. https://doi.org/10.32918/nrs.2019.1(81).06

Abstract

An approach is described for assessment of the end state radiological criteria for remediation of radioactively contaminated sites. The target criteria are set in a form of prospective effective doses for members of the population who are subject to the higher exposures (representative persons). Brief review of international best practice in setting risk based remedial criteria is presented. The site-specific release criteria for activity concentrations in released material (e.g., Bq/g of soil) are derived using tabulated values of radionuclide activity from IAEA Safety Guide RS-G-1.7 (corresponding to the effective dose of 10 μSv/a). These tabulated values are scaled with the relevant target dose criteria for remediation of the specific site. Applicability and limitations (e.g., with regard to volume of released material) of proposed approach are discussed. The procedure for incorporating complimentary site-specific scenarios is described. The article further illustrates the approach by application of the methodology to the specific radioactively contaminated site (i.e., radioactive waste storage site with clean-up wastes of Chernobyl origin situated in Kiev Region). The proposed approach is generally applicable to a wide range of similar problems.

https://doi.org/10.32918/nrs.2019.1(81).06

References

1. Slavik O., Moravek J. (1996). Planning for environmental Restauration in Slovak Republic. Planning for environmental Restauration od radioactively contaminated Sites in Central and Eastern Europe. Vol. 2. Planning for environmental Restauration of contaminated Sites. IAEA-TECDOC-865, International Atomic Energy Agency, Vienna, pp.183–196.

2. Zeevaert T., Hedemann, Jensen P., Brendler, Nordlinder S. V., Bousher A. (1999). Manual on restoration strategies for radioactivecontaminated sites. Restoration Strategies for radioactively contaminated Sites and their Close Surroundings. RESTRAT — WP6, Report no. RESTRAT-TD 14. Retrieved from www.hzdr.de/projects/RESTRAT/DOCS/TD14.pdf

3. Determining Clean-up Goals at Radioactively Contaminated Sites: Case Studies, Interstate Technology and Regulatory Council — Radionuclides Team, USA, 2002. 103 p. Retrieved from www.itrcweb.org/GuidanceDocuments/RAD-2.pdf

4. Laria M. (2013). Remediation of radioactively contaminated sites and management of the resulting waste. Radioactive waste management and contaminated site clean-up. Processes, technologies and international experience, Woodhead Publishing Series in Energy, pp. 301–326, doi.org/10.1533/9780857097446.1.301

5. Nuclear Site Remediation and Restoration during Decommissioning of Nuclear Installations, NEA No. 719, Nuclear Energy Agency, Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development, 2014. 246 p. Retrieved from www.oecd-nea.org/rwm/pubs/2014/7192-cpd-report.pdf

6. Radiation protection and safety of radiation sources: international basic safety standards. No. GSR Part 3. Vienna: International Atomic Energy Agency, 2014. 471 p.

7. Overcoming Barriers in the Implementation of Environmental Remediation Projects, Nuclear Energy Series No. NW-T-3.4, International Atomic Energy Agency, Vienna, 2013. 71 p.

8. Technical Report Task D3: Development of remediation dossier for Pilot Facility- DWSF Pisky-1. Vol.2. Safety Assessment Report. Project 12D. Remediation of Radioactive Waste Storage Sites Resulting from the Chernobyl Nuclear Power Plant Accident and Situated Outside the Exclusion Zone, Service Contract No. 2015/361‑841, BRENK Syst.; TUV Nord; DMT; PLEJADES (Consortium), 2018. 170 p.

9. Bugai D., Gebauer J., Scior C., Sizov A., Burness S., Retz Y., Molitor N. Safety ranking of Chernobyl radioactive legacy sites situated in populated areas for prioritization of remedial measures. Nuclear Physic and Atomic Energy (accepted for publication).

10. Release of Sites from Regulatory Control on Termination of Practices. Safety Guide No. WS-G-5.1, International Atomic Energy Agency, Vienna, 2006. 49 p.

11. Application of the concept of exclusion, exemption and clearance, Safety Guide no. RS-G-1.7, International Atomic Energy Agency, Vienna, 2004. 39 p.

12. Derivation of Activity Concentration Values for Exclusion, Exemption and Clearance, Safety Series Rep. no. 44, International Atomic Energy Agency, Vienna, 2005. 141 p.

13. Hygienic regulations “Levels of radioactive material release from regulatory control” [Gigienichny normativy “Rivni zvilnennya radioaktivnih materialiv vid reguluyuchego kontrollyu”], approved by Decree of a Chief Public Health Official of Ukraine No. 22 dated 30.06.2010.

14. Law of Ukraine “On the Legal Status of the Territory Exposed to the Radioactive Contamination Resulting from the ChNPP Accident” [Zakon Ukrainin “Pro pravoviy regim territorii, sch zaznala zabrudnennya vnaslido Chornobylskoi katastrofy”]. Retrieved from zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/791 %D0 %B0-12

15. Homutynyn Yu. V., Kashparov V. A., Zhebrovskaya E. I. (2001). Optimization of measurement sampling during the radioecological monitoring [Optimizaciya probootbora izmereniy pri radioecolgicheskom monitoringe], UkrNSRIAD, Kiev, 160 p.